1. Establish that the documents are genuine equivalents

If the Turkish catalogue covers a complete range while the English document describes one product, do not treat them as translations of the same content. Compare scope, model lists, technical values and edition dates. Separate language editions from materially different market offers. An EN suffix in a filename is not a translation review. Headings, tables, image explanations and contact information should also serve the intended reader. Have the content owner approve the mapping before it is handed to the implementation team.

2. Choose a method supported by the file delivery setup

Google documents HTTP Link headers as a way to indicate language alternatives for non-HTML files such as PDFs. This information belongs to the server response, not an ordinary hyperlink printed inside the document. The documented approach identifies all alternatives, including the requested version, with fully qualified addresses in the same set. Ask the developer whether the hosting or CDN serving the files can manage these headers. Copying HTML link tags into a PDF is not a substitute for configuring its response.

3. Prepare an implementation record with actual URLs

The hypothetical mapping has two entries: the Turkish catalogue with its full URL and tr, and the English catalogue with its full URL and en. Check that both responses declare the same alternatives. Do not replace a language code with a country name. Consider a regional language designation only when the content genuinely targets that region. If the download redirects elsewhere, inspect the final response as well. A setting saved in a control panel is not evidence of the response delivered to a visitor.

4. Keep language switching understandable for people

Technical mapping does not replace a usable route to another edition. On the download page, identify the language, scope and current version. A descriptive language-specific link is more useful than several identical “Download catalogue” labels. Check whether the PDF text can be read and selected; a scan-only document needs its own accessibility assessment. When a new edition is released, review the URL mapping and download page together. Do not automatically connect an outdated English file to a substantially revised Turkish edition merely because both filenames look similar.

5. Distinguish implementation checks from search outcomes

Open each file directly and confirm its content, format, access and language relationships. Do not record a blocked or removed alternative as live. Correct response headers do not prove indexing or guarantee that Google will show a particular language version. Review Search Console evidence at the document URL level separately. Use the multilingual SEO guide for the overall site structure, the technical document library guide for navigation and SEO services for implementation scope. Keep a dated mapping record so future changes can be checked against an agreed version.

Frequently asked questions

Does hreflang on the download page also describe the PDF?

It describes that page. Assess the response of the PDF itself separately.

Is every foreign-language PDF an equivalent edition?

No. Verify content scope and version equivalence before mapping language alternatives.

Sources & further reading

Google — Localized versions, HTTP headers ↗
SEO & web optimisationLet’s discuss this service ↗