Choose work that addresses the reader’s decision

Not every completed project speaks to the same audience. Someone commissioning fitted furniture may care about materials and installation. A manufacturer may need to understand how a technical catalogue was organised. Define the decision your reader faces, then choose relevant work for which publication permission is available.

A logo alone does not establish a successful outcome. A direct client relationship, subcontracted contribution and technology used on a project are different things. Explain the relationship clearly so a reader does not infer a partnership or a wider scope that never existed. This is especially important when several teams contributed to the same deliverable.

Write the need, intervention and outcome separately

The need is the original question. The intervention describes what your team did. The outcome is the change actually observed. Reorganising product groups is an intervention; an associated sales improvement requires separate evidence. Do not turn a description of work into a performance claim simply because the latter sounds more impressive.

Where measurements exist, record the source, period and comparison conditions. Do not ignore simultaneous changes to pricing or campaigns. Without a measurement, explain the completed scope and visible design decisions. Those can be useful to a prospective client without an invented percentage filling the gap.

Preserve the context of customer words

Confirm the final quotation, attribution and role with the customer. If wording is shortened or corrected, have the final version checked. Do not turn one positive sentence into a promise the speaker never made. Track permission to publish photographs and logos alongside the text rather than leaving it in a separate, forgotten conversation.

A small editorial record can include the content item, its source, approving person, date and destination page. This is a suggested production workflow, not a claim that one table satisfies every legal permission requirement. Leave confidential material out of the public story and retain an approved version that editors can refer back to later.

Separate the four content fields

Set realistic presentation and search expectations

A short introduction, a few relevant images, a clear role and an appropriate next step can form the story’s structure. Help visitors understand the type of work before confronting them with a wall of praise. On mobile, preserve the relationship between the quotation, its attribution and the explanatory context.

Google does not make self-serving reviews eligible for review stars when an Organization or LocalBusiness controls reviews about itself. Do not sell a testimonial section as a guarantee of search-result stars. Our 3A Elevator project page offers portfolio context, without adding a new testimonial or performance claim here. During website planning, decide which actual work can be explained and what evidence supports it.

Frequently asked questions

Can we publish a case study without performance data?

Yes. Explain approved scope, design decisions and verified delivery. Do not present unmeasured performance as an outcome.

Is a client logo enough?

It does not explain the relationship or contribution. A short description of the actual service and role is more informative.

Sources & further reading

Google — Review snippet guidelines
Web design & developmentLet’s discuss this service